Subversion of Loyalty by The Elite

Loyalty Indocrination Of the Initiates

I pledge allegiance to the Flag (of the nation as stated) and to the Republic ( of which the symbol represents) and swear undying loyalty (so help me a higher Power) to defend, protect and empower the Republic by my devotion and obedience. The preceeding affirmation of allegiance may resonate with some familiar tone, yet it is presented in a general form designed to promote or engender a desired behaviour of loyalty in the subjects of the Republic. The Queen or King of some other nation has also available a representative method to elicit the emotions of loyalty and obedience from it's subjects through public singning of national anthems and loyalty hymns.

An anthem, or a hymn to a sovereign as, God Save Our (Named Sovereign) followed by verses of greatness, victorious campaigns and patriotism for the nation elicit emotions of national pride and loyalty. The calls for action to a national cause are echoed with pride by a patriotic nation. Dying becomes bearable when one has sacrificed himself for a nobler cause. One heeds the call that is presented by his sovereign, his president, his commander or even his religious representative. Yet, the decision to go to war and sacrifice one's life is not of the individual's choice. The decision for a collective action was mandated by an elite, a respected person, a person of power and influence.
The Elites have thus obtained the exclusive right to exercise power and to maintain control ower society through universally accepted, traditionally established and politically motivated protocols. Historically, the powers of the elite were generally recognized as the divinely inherited rights of the sovereign. Over time these powers have become usurped by succeeding elites. These are the powers of the Elite: To Govern: design laws, install an army, establish the police. To Mandate: etablish a legislature to make laws. To Control Individuals: by establishing universal education, by permitting religious practice, by promoting mass media methods of universal indoctrination.

Chris
Rev. 01 Nov. 18, 2004

Mind Control in a Structured Society

See, hear, think, believe me.

Since our early childhood we have relied on our family to introduce to us the locally accepted norms of behaviour, customs and beliefs of our society or familiy clan. The people exerting the most influence were our family members, friends and neighbours. The social behaviour skills and traditional beliefs that we have inherited were theirs to give. And so, we have become our fathers' sons or our mothers's daughters. Yet, are we predestined to inherit their lot in life as they have inherited from their parents? Are we as limited by lack of choices in our career options as they were? Can we breach the barriers of sociol economic strata and escape the ramparts of our inherited lifepath?

Consider the reflections upon one's options by individuals in other societies with more stringent rules of behaviour. An individual's prospective options in more diverse societies may be limited due to; a low social birth status as in the caste structure in India, a commoner class birth in a heritage oriented society in Britain, an ethnic clan birth origin in the tribal clan structure in Somalia or a lower class neighbourhood origin in a glib judgemental posturing social strata in United States.

Peoples' concepts everywhere have been influenced by entrenched traditions and ideology instilled into them by others. Their beliefs become your beliefs, their fears become your fears, and so on with loyalty, fears, value systems and prejudice. Thus you have become converted, subverted, indoctrinated, controlled, conformed, non dissenting and non resenting.

Yet, some day when you decide to become free, on that day, you may want to join Me.

Chris

To War In Fallujah

November 3, 2004 The Annals of Human History: Predestined Critical Events

News Flash John Kerry concedes presidential election to the incumbent president George Bush. Stop.
The war against the insurgents in Fallujah can resume again.

It is now November 6 and for the past 3 days the angry clouds of war resonate with the ghostly coloured images of gathering ground forces near Fallujah as shown by the news clips on the TV screen. The gathering of 10,000 American marines and 14,500 Iraqi armed forces indicates the nearing assault on the insurgents in the city. Now a majority of 250,000 inhabitants have left the city leaving up to 50,000 hapless civilians and up to 3,000 insurgents to fend off for themselves and survive the attacking forces. This showdown may go down in the annals of human history as a critical battle of will between forces of unequal proportion. This unequal struggle may produce a reaction long after a military resolution of the massive assault on rebellious militants and civilian non combatants. The world shaking event resulting from assault on Fallujah may be an overwhelming breach in the watershed of contained resentment against American forces by Iraqi people. The coalition forces are intent in displaying a firm resolve to dissuade further insurgency and enable dissolution of centers of insurgent resistance. Yet, this unilateral action may again provoke the proud Iraqi psyche as the civilian population is assaulted from both sides by irreverent military aggressors.

Waiver: An essay to prepare for future blogs.
Chris

Nov.9, 2004
Revised number of coalition forces are made available. Only 6,500 American and 2,000 Iraqui has been involved in ground assault on Fallujah. However the large force of air support, transport services for war equipment and ancilliary services are not included in these numbers.

Nov. 18, 2004
The invasion has mainly concluded on Nov. 14, 2004. Yet, the conflict is unresolved. New statistics reveal that nearly 10,000 US army troops took part in the action. Another 2,500 Iraqui troops were part of the assault. Nearly 1000 insurgent casualties resulted and 1200 prisoners were detained. Scant information is provided regarding civilian casualties. Evidence of American hard line positin of take no prisoners as fears of insurgent booby trap trickery was evident. Fears abound that majority of the insurgents evacuated before the initial assault Nov. 6, 2004.